Dramatic changes in the London areas

Whilst workings on this regurgitate I have collected a series of entrusts. My results consist of how the primal Business District (CBD) shows us the burgher Model. As you can prove by the map below capital of the United Kingdom intelligibly shows the rings of the Burgess Model. This is just one of many maps of London that shows the Model. I frame that what I intended to find from research such as maps and graphs was correct.1) Danecourt Gardens 162. Carnforth Gardens 43. Gale Street 94. Harold Road -35. Queens Road West 46. Wellington Way -157. Bow road 4One of the first off destinations we visited was Danecourt Gardens, as you can deal my results show that this location was the highest point on my graph. Danecourt Gardens showed high quality, well- purported uncaring properties in good condition. The range of properties in this field of necessitate command high prices. This area demonstrated a safe purlieu consisting of uncongested streets, which resulted in easy parkin g and access that in turn creates short pollution. The area was attractive in design and of a good constitution there was plenty of open space and greenery. In world long this is a desirable area to live in.On the other end of the descale my graph shows a completely different story. For instance on visit Wellington Way, which was one of my last places to visit, this graph will show dear(predicate) but badly designed and in poor condition properties. From my observations the absolute majority of properties I saw were tower block flats. As a result of these designs it is commonly described, as a Concrete jungle. Due to this area of design parking for non-residents was difficult, parking for residents was provided by course of designated car parks. In general there was little open green space, the majority being tarmacadam and paving. I also observed a large amount of hooliganism consisting of graffiti and damage to street furniture. Of all the locations I visited in my impres sion I found Wellington Way was the poorest.Key QuestionThe environmental areas vary as we go still out of the Burgess Model. overtaking from the CBD the first type of housing you come to would be terraced housing. The last member of the burgess model would be luxury high class residential, so from the first housing section to the last you can clearly see how much the type of housing improves.HypothesisThe environmental quality clearly has an improved change with the further you travel from the CBD.My ConclusionIn my decision I found dramatic changes in the London areas, starting with the CBD and locomotion out to the more high-class residential areas. I found that this study highlighted the environmental quality within the east London areas starting with Upminster working our way down to Plaistow.I would say that quality housing usually attracts a different class of people compared to the central areas of Londons terraced housing. I found that the number of detached properties greatly out numbered that of semi and terraced houses.Working my way towards the CBD the pattern of housing changed dramatically there was the occasional detached position but in main it was dominated by semi detached properties. One of the problems of this type of housing is that off road parking is poor. This makes a problem of congested streets.Eventually on reaching the centre of London all property was either terraced of flat accommodation. These particular types of properties provide no parking other than permit holders or at payment metres. The further I progressed into London the more obvious that parking was a atrocious problem.Gardens eventually became non-existent the only means of relaxation was by way of balconies or rooftops.Graffiti is an environmental problem of which London has its fair share. Graffiti is wide spread over almost everything.London can be a nice place to live in, it all depends on your financial position.