Saturday, March 16, 2019
Trade Commission :: essays research papers
The Federal Trade Commission, in submitting a Request For Public Comment Concerning Guides For The Dog And Cat Food Industry, is ask the American Public to assess guidelines for monitoring the court diet intentness that lease been in place since 1969. Since the basic thrust of the professional guidelines was to stop misrepresentation in the industry, it is hard to imagine that the public would disagree with the superior intent of the guidelines. It would also be prudent to assess whether a recapitulation of such sound guidelines would be either necessary or cost the cost of carrying out the assessment. On the other hand, it has been thirty years since the professional guidelines were implemented, giving the public and the industry time to see if the guidelines have do their job in a cost-effective manner and whether or non they need to be retooled for an industry that has gone through considerable scientific and economic changes. Therefore, it would seem reasonable to c onduct a survey that would objective key areas, such as any overlapping of the guidelines with federal, state, and local laws, the oneness of industry self-regulation in a new era of economic and technological advances, and whether or not the guidelines have imposed undue cost to both(prenominal) the industry and the public.Few would argue with the points of the original guidelines, whether it is monitoring misleading claims in advertising, or monitoring the quality of the products themselves. Despite economic and technological advances that have taken place in the industry since 1969, the guidelines still hold up as sound. There are also federal, state, and local laws that attempt to command the same integrity in the ducky food industry. The pet food industry also closely monitors itself. Given all these factors, it would seem go around to question the necessity of such a survey, or, at least, to limit its background knowledge and cost.What could be unseen motives for initiat ing such a reassessment? The American pet food industry would certainly want to keep pressure on the government to regulate foreign competition, insisting that competitors meet the same compressed standards set for American manufacturers. The FTC would also stand to gain from the number of its workers that would be paid for conducting the reassessment and the power and prestige that such guidelines tend to pass along the FTCIt might be useful to assess how much cost the original guidelines have imposed on the industry and the consumer in increased prices for pet foods and if the guidelines have added anything to federal, state, and local laws that already monitor the industry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment