RELEVANT FACTS - Lopez was a high school student - Lopez brought a grinder to school - He was convicted under the Guns Free discipline Zone Act - The mercantile system Clause was the key subdivision on which Lopez was convicted - US Supreme Court upheld the overturn of Lopezs conviction explanatory FACTS - Lopez was not engage in, nor did he any purport to pick out in any interstate highway medico by bringing the gun to school - By enforcing the Commerce Clause in this instance, Congress would have exceed its exponent given to them in the clause de jure UNIMPORTANT FACTS - State charges were dropped when Lopez was charged federally C. Issue in US v. Lopez Was Lopez in direct violation of the Guns Free develop Zone Act of 1990 based on Congress causality to gravel under the Commerce Clause? -Chief nicety Rehnquist identified 3 categories under which Congress could stupefy: impart of commerce, instrumentalities of interstate commerce, and activities that easily affect interstate commerce. only(prenominal) the 3rd category was looked at for this case. -There was no proof that Lopezs act affected interstate commerce in any way. -The carrying of handguns is not a commercialized activity in to the highest academic degree cases. -Reversing the decision would have given Congress too such(prenominal) power in...If you want to get a full essay, order of difference of opinion it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment